Powerful Symbols and Symbolism of The Scarlet Letter :: Scarlet Letter essays

The Powerful Symbol of the Scarlet Letter      Ã‚  Ã‚   In Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter, Hester Prynne's scarlet token liberates her more than it punishes her.   First of all, Hester's soul is freed by her admission of her crime; by enduring her earthly punishment, Hester is assured of a place in the heavens.   Also, though her appearance is much hampered by the scarlet letter, her mind is freed by it, that an intellectual passion rises from her isolation and suffering.   Finally, it defines her identity, for the letter makes Hester the woman that she is; it gives her roots, character, and a uniqueness to her being that sets her apart from the other Puritans.   The scarlet letter is indeed a blessing to Hester Prynne, more than the curse she believes it to be.      Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   The scarlet symbol of ignominy may have defiled Hester's public image, yet it has been a benefit rather than a bane to her soul, for by admitting her crime to the crowd, her soul is freed from two hells:   first, the fiery pit where she would otherwise go after death, and second, the own personal hell Hester will create for herself if she had chosen to hide her sin in her heart. Though it was ordered for Hester to wear the letter, it was still her own choice to make it in a vivid scarlet, "so fantastically embroidered and illuminated upon her bosom."   Hester chose red as the color of her brand of shame, to declare to the rest of the townspeople that she is prepared to acknowledge her sin, instead of denying it; she could have chosen to wear her "A" in a plain and nondistinct color, to escape the townspeople's disdain.   By displaying her guilt however, she is granted the opportunity to face her punishment bravely, thus through her public humiliation, she achieves freedom from the personal guilt of not suffering enough for her crimes.   Furthermore, "the scarlet letter, forthwith seemed to scorch into Hester's breast, as if it had been red-hot." The scarlet A's glowing embers, scorching they may be, also serve to heal, for the pain they inflict on Hester enables her to properly atone for her sin; by devoting this lifetime to repentance and expiation, she would receive relief in Powerful Symbols and Symbolism of The Scarlet Letter :: Scarlet Letter essays The Powerful Symbol of the Scarlet Letter      Ã‚  Ã‚   In Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter, Hester Prynne's scarlet token liberates her more than it punishes her.   First of all, Hester's soul is freed by her admission of her crime; by enduring her earthly punishment, Hester is assured of a place in the heavens.   Also, though her appearance is much hampered by the scarlet letter, her mind is freed by it, that an intellectual passion rises from her isolation and suffering.   Finally, it defines her identity, for the letter makes Hester the woman that she is; it gives her roots, character, and a uniqueness to her being that sets her apart from the other Puritans.   The scarlet letter is indeed a blessing to Hester Prynne, more than the curse she believes it to be.      Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   The scarlet symbol of ignominy may have defiled Hester's public image, yet it has been a benefit rather than a bane to her soul, for by admitting her crime to the crowd, her soul is freed from two hells:   first, the fiery pit where she would otherwise go after death, and second, the own personal hell Hester will create for herself if she had chosen to hide her sin in her heart. Though it was ordered for Hester to wear the letter, it was still her own choice to make it in a vivid scarlet, "so fantastically embroidered and illuminated upon her bosom."   Hester chose red as the color of her brand of shame, to declare to the rest of the townspeople that she is prepared to acknowledge her sin, instead of denying it; she could have chosen to wear her "A" in a plain and nondistinct color, to escape the townspeople's disdain.   By displaying her guilt however, she is granted the opportunity to face her punishment bravely, thus through her public humiliation, she achieves freedom from the personal guilt of not suffering enough for her crimes.   Furthermore, "the scarlet letter, forthwith seemed to scorch into Hester's breast, as if it had been red-hot." The scarlet A's glowing embers, scorching they may be, also serve to heal, for the pain they inflict on Hester enables her to properly atone for her sin; by devoting this lifetime to repentance and expiation, she would receive relief in

Jurassic Park Essay

Technology is one of our most beloved pieces of ongoing history, but does it cause more harm than it does help? In the film Jurassic Park, Steven Spielberg portrays the theme technology as an evil force to be reckoned with. Spielberg shows this through the plot, characters, and dialogue. Technology is a major theme because other than the hidden context that viewers have to seek it is everywhere in the film. A viewer thinks of technology as a helping hand, shortcut, or an advance of human nature, but in the film it is portrayed as something that should not be used to try and control nature. Also the complete opposite of what you would normally think, it will not work in your favor. The plot of Jurassic Park shows many ways of people being too reliant on technology. One way it shows this is in the very beginning of the movie they are transporting a dinosaur into the park and the cage had a green light on meaning that it was turned on and ready to transport the dinosaur, despite the green light being on a man was killed when he should have been completely safe (Jurassic Park). This sets the tone for the rest of the movie that you should never rely too much on technology because nothing is perfect. Another way the film Jurassic Park shows the theme overreliance on technology is when Nerdy, the computer nerd, turns off all the parks systems the electric fences shut off and they became completely vulnerable (Jurassic Park). On top of everything they could not even call for help because the phones were also down. Again, this just shows them being too reliant on technology. All this is caused because of Hammond, he is the creator of Jurassic Park and he is the one who counts on technology the most. The characters in the film showed the theme by their character arcs. Hammond, for example, started a park to show off the wonders of real dinosaurs from a safe distance of course. He counted on technology to run everything and keep people safe. When everything started going bad, everyone said they should just shut it down and not go on with this project. Hammond continued to fight for it, but in the end he gave up on it just like everyone else already had. Grant on the other hand hated technology from the start and did not want anything to do with it. Grant was the antithesis of technology, in the beginning of the film he was excavating and he hits a computer and it stops working this was foreshadowing that technology can break down at any moment. These characters symbolize the theme by what they go through in the film, as well as what they say. Steven Spielberg portrayed the theme by the dialogue in his film, Jurassic Park. Dr. Ian Malcolm said â€Å"God help us, we’re in the hands of engineers. † (Jurassic Park), this shows that Malcolm does not trust in technology all he wants it get the fame and money. In the film Jurassic Park Hammond said â€Å"We spared no expense. † (Jurassic Park), this was in the middle of the film meaning everyone else had already lost hope for the park and just wanted to get out but Hammond still believed in the park and also believed that it could keep going. Hammond also said â€Å"Dennis, our lives are in your hands and you have butter-fingers. (Jurassic Park), was a way of foreshadowing events that later came in the film, those events were, Dennis Nedry, the one running the behind the scenes of Jurassic Park, would turn all the systems off, put a encrypted password on, and slip away from the headquarters only to be killed and eaten by raptor, leaving the rest of the crew and family helpless. Steven Spielberg made you seek the theme â€Å"overreliance of technology† through the dialogue, not making it as obvious as other key events in the film. As evidenced by Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park, film makers can use various filmmaking strategies to influence the theme of a film. Steven Spielberg used characterization, dialogue, specific scenes, and the plot to portray the theme â€Å"overreliance of technology†. Spielberg showed if one relies on technology so much it can get to a point where if something were to happen to technology you would wander around aimlessly not having the slightest clue on what to do. Steven Spielberg used this though various techniques, including, the plot, characters, and dialogue. Audiences should think twice about being dependent on a device that at any moment could become dysfunctional, they would have no idea what to do if that were to happen.

What if German was the Official US Language

You might have heard the rumor that German almost became the official language of the  United  States of America. The legend usually goes something like this: â€Å"In 1776, German came within one vote of becoming Americas official language instead of English.† It is a story that Germans, German teachers, and many other people like to tell. But how much of it is actually true? At first glance, it may sound plausible. After all, Germans have played an important role in US history. Think of the Hessian soldiers, von Steuben, Molly Pitcher and all that. It is estimated that about 17% of US-Americans have German ancestors.A closer look reveals several serious problems with this official-language story. First of all, the United States has never had an â€Å"official language†Ã¢â‚¬â€English, German or any other—and doesnt have one nowadays. Nor was there any such vote in 1776. Congressional debate and a vote concerning German probably did take place in 1795, but dealt with translating US laws into German, and the proposal to publish laws in languages other than English was rejected a few months later. It is likely that the myth of German as the official language of the US first arose in the 1930s, but it dates back to the countrys earliest history and another similar story. Most scholars suspect that the US legend originated as a German-American Bund propaganda move aimed at giving German added weight via the spurious claim that it had very nearly become Americas official language. By mixing wishful thinking with certain historical events in Pennsylvania, the Nazi-influenced Bund produced the national vote story. On reflection, it is ridiculous to think that German might have become the official language of the US. At no time in its early (!) history was the percentage of Germans in the United States ever higher than about ten percent, with most of that concentrated in one state: Pennsylvania. Even in that state, at no time did the number of German-speaking inhabitants ever exceed one-third of the population. Any claim that German might have become the main language of Pennsylvania in the 1790s, when over 66 percent of the population spoke English, is simply absurd. Clearly, this is just another sad example of the power of propaganda. Although the outcome is rather insignificant--does it really matter whether a few people believe that this might have actually been true?--it draws a misleading portrait of the Germans and their influence in this world.   But lets leave the idiotic Nazi  world aside: What would it have meant, if the German language was chosen as the official language of the US? What does it mean that India, Australia, and the USA officially speak English?

A Timeline of the History of India

Reflection Of The Returned - 983 Words

The novel The Returned, by Jason Mott, takes place around 2005, in a small town of 150 people, called Acadia. Acadia is a very religious town, so when people begin to return from the dead, everyone has a different position. The mood from the story conveys many different emotions, when Jacob returns to his mother and father after 50 years in a grave, showing no signs of decomposition, the reader feels a sense of joy for the family, regaining their son. Once it is revealed that events like this are happening all over the world, curiosity and wonder fill the air. The main characters of this novel is the Hargrave family. The father, Harold Hargrave, is about a 70 year old man, with very thin, gray, hair. He has grown shorter than his wife†¦show more content†¦Here, the reader sees that most people in the town wish to have The Returned killed. Shortly after the meeting, the President orders all Returned to stay in their homes. All throughout the world, The Returned are being kill ed and imprisoned. Harold and Jacob are taken prisoner in the Acadia schoolhouse. Lucille attempt to gather The Returned not yet imprisoned and save them. However, Agent Bellamy gets to them first and in an unexpected turn of events: rescues them.When a fight between the soldier and the army of The Returned breaks out, Lucille sacrifices herself to save Jacob, she dies in the arms of her beloved husband and son. After she dies, Harold finds a note Lucille wrote to him. In this notes, she confesses she never truly believed the Returned Jacob to be her real son, but Harold had always believed it. The conflict in this novel is man vs. society, or men vs. society. The Hargraves and The Returned are constantly fighting against the government’s orders on The Returned. When the community of Acadia gathers in the church, the townspeople reveal they do not want The Returned in their town. â€Å"Then the words were on the bottom of the television screen...President Orders Returned Con fided to Their Homes†(89). Once this order is issued, people across the world break out in a mass hysteria, killing The Returned and their families. â€Å"But the government was still not sure what they wanted to do with the people, so they held themShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of Ovid s The Apollo Essay1556 Words   |  7 Pagesthat is one of the most evil and destructive. Self-importance has the ability to take over the soul, for those who behold it care for only themselves. Though, if one loves themselves then they are loving something that is impossible to be found and returned. Narcissus rejects Echo’s love with no sense of remorse, hurting what her life revolved around. Her love for Narcissus was her life, so when she was rejected she fled. Echo, â€Å"though repulsed, her love persists†¦ [and] she wastes away,† isolated inRead MoreThe Optical-Time Domain Reflectometer827 Words   |  3 PagesThe OTDR is a device that measures distances to a reflecti on surface by measuring the time it takes for a lightwave pulse to reflect from the surface. Reflection surfaces include the ends of fiber cables, breaks in the fiber, splice locations, and connector locations. The ability to provide these measurements simplifies the fault location procedure for fiber systems. The OTDR measures the scattered and reflected light returning from a pulse of transmitted light. Pulses of light are generated fromRead MoreRoberto Matt Making The Invisible Visible1635 Words   |  7 Pagesrapidly approaching, Matta made his way to New York City in late 1938. Here, in the mid-40’s, he changed the style of his work to reflect the terrifying war around himself. This collection of pieces is known as his â€Å"Social Morphologies†, due to its reflection of the political and social perspective of the times, as opposed to his more introspective earlier collection. In this series, his works took on a more linear appearance with machine-like creatures as his main subjects. These paintings also featureRead MoreMarc Calculated The Day s Profit And Set Aside Money894 Words   |  4 Pagesclosed her palm. Smiling, she accepted the money and promised to do as he said. The following day, Tabitha prepared for her trip to Vermouthshire. She stood before the mirror tending to her face. Uri came up, stood beside her, and watched her reflection. â€Å"As always, you’re beautiful.† She beamed, â€Å"Thank you, Son. You’ll make a lucky woman a fine husband someday.† Uri’s smiled to his ears. â€Å"I’m going to purchase a few items for myself and for you. Would you like to come? That is if your father doesn’tRead MoreUniversities Should Require Abroad Programs For Any Majors833 Words   |  4 PagesWelcome Back Reception in the fall for returned study abroad students. At this event, students can meet and talk with each other about their experiences, and we ask them to participate in some reflection activities together. Second, our Study Abroad Fall includes several student showcases, where returned students put together presentations about their experiences abroad. They’re able to showcase their experience to engage students attending the fair. Many returned study abroad students also volunteerRead MoreThe World Is Flat : Summary1115 Words   |  5 Pagestwenty-first century. These convergences include the connection o f the 10 Flatteners, the beginning of our adapting to use these flatteners in an efficient way, and that the economies of China, India, the former Soviet Empire open up to collaborate. Reflection: Because The World is Flat was published in 2005, the basic message of Thomas Friedman’s lecture is fairly common knowledge nowadays. I am well aware of the fact that the world is more connected now than ever before. We have access to an abundanceRead MoreWhy Men Choose Different Childcare Sectors1392 Words   |  6 Pagesethical consideration in order to protect data (BERA, 2011; Great Britain, 1998). Additionally in order to gain access to the high school a gatekeeper was used to distribute and collect the questionnaires, access to the returned questionnaires was minimal as most were returned within sealed envelopes and all participants were aware of the gatekeeper through the attachment letters within the questionnaire (appendix 5). Throughout the collection period the gatekeeper gave any feedback from the participantsRead MoreReflection Essay1616 Words   |  7 Pagesintegral part of nursing. It will also demonstrate how reflection enabled me to make sense of and learn from this experience, as well as identify any further learning developments needed to improve my practice and achieve the level of competency needed for when I qualify as an assistant practitioner. While discussing the knowledge underpinning practice, evidence based literature will be reviewed to support my discussion and for the purpose of reflection the essay will be written in the first person. SpouseRead MoreTeams in the 21st Century Reflection Paper829 Words   |  4 PagesTEAMS IN THE 21st CENTURY REFLECTION PAPER Teams in the 21st century reflection paper Rodolfo Villarreal 06/28/09 University of Phoenix Teams in the 21st century reflection paper â€Å"Individual commitment to a group effort – that is what makes a team work, a company work, a society work, a civilization work.† Vince Lombardi, http://thinkexist.com/quotes/vince_lombardi/4.html By working in teams and experiencing its process, one can learn the importance of sharing ideas, thoughts, and informationRead MoreLeadership Is A Complex Phenomenon Involving The Leader, Followers, And The Situation1587 Words   |  7 Pagesindigenous Liberian head of state, sent Johnson-Sirleaf into exile in 1980 in a military coup lead. President Johnson-Sirleaf returned to Liberia in 1985, ran for a seat in the local Senate and was sentenced to ten (10) years in prison when she spoke out against the Doe’s military regime. She only served a partial sentence before fleeing the country once more. She returned to Liberia in 1997 as an economist working with the World Bank and Citibank in Africa, after Samuel Doe’s removal as head of state

Gunsnroses Essay Example For Students

Gunsnroses Essay BiographyThe founding members of the most controversial heavy rock band of the late 1980s included Axl Rose (b. William Bailey, 6 February 1962, Lafayette, Indiana, USA) and Izzy Stradlin (b. Jeffrey Isbell, 8 April 1962, Lafayette, Indiana, USA). Vocalist Rose, who had first sung at the age of five in a church choir, met guitarist Stradlin in Los Angeles in 1984. He changed his name to Rose at the age of 17 when he discovered who his real father was, the Axl prefix coming from a band with whom he had rehearsed in Indiana. With Tracii Guns (guitar) and Rob Gardner (drums), they formed a rock band called Hollywood Rose and L.A. Guns. Soon afterwards, Guns and Gardner left, to be replaced by drummer Steven Adler (b. 22 January 1965, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) and guitarist Slash (b. Saul Hudson, 23 July 1965, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, England). With bass player Duff McKagan (b. Michael McKagan, 5 February 1964, Seattle, Washington, USA), the band was renamed Guns NRoses. In 1986 the ba nd was signed to Geffen Records. During 1987 they toured extensively and their debut, Appetite For Destruction, went on to sell 20 million copies worldwide and reached number 1 in the USA a year after its release date. In 1989, the eight-track album G N R Lies was issued, becoming a big hit on both sides of the Atlantic, as were the singles Sweet Child O Mine, Paradise City and Patience. During the 80s the band suffered from its rock and roll lifestyle and consequently saw several band members come and go. In a 1991 world tour their exciting and unpredictable performances brought favorable comparisons with the Rolling Stones. In September the band released the highly publicized pair of albums, Use Your Illusion I and Use Your Illusion II, preceded by a version of Bob Dylans Knockin On Heavens Door from the soundtrack of Days Of Thunder. In 1994 the band did a cover version of the Rolling Stones Sympathy For The Devil for the soundtrack to Interview With The Vampire. Differences rocked the band again in November 1996 when Slash confirmed Roses departure, although this situation was reversed in February 1997 when Rose allegedly purchased the rights to the Guns NRoses name. Later in the year, this was seemingly confirmed by the recruitment of Robin Finck, formerly of Nine Inch Nails, to replace Slash. Words/ Pages : 393 / 24

Gun Control Claim Essay Example For Students

Gun Control Claim Essay Argument PaperOver the last twenty years, a large amount of effort and money has been spent overlegislation regarding gun control. Gun control advocates maintained that increased gun controlcould reduce the soaring crime rates of the early 70s. However, most of the arguments used forgun control are the result of careful manipulation of data and emotional appeal. These mythsare twisted by our liberal media until they are seen as the truth. However, despite the claims ofgun control activists, gun control does not reduce crime, it leaves law abiding citizensincreasingly vulnerable to violent crime. One common claim of gun control advocates is that gun control in foreign countries,notably Great Britain, is responsible for their lower crime rates. They present statistics showingthat Britain has lower murder rates than America, but skip some other interesting information. First, the gun control methods used in Britain include searches and other checks foundunconstitutional in America. Also, the British are far more successful than Americans inprosecuting criminals. For instance, 20% of robberies reported in London end in conviction,compared to only 5% in New York City (Ten Myths 5). In a broader sense, consider that despite the fact that in a typical year about 8.1 millionviolent crimes will be committed in America, only 724 thousand will be arrested. Of those, only150 thousand will receive prison sentences, and over 36 thousand will serve less than one yearterms. The biggest problem in America is our revolving door justice system (Ten Myths 3). Despite the efficiency of British investigative procedures, the British armed robbery ratehas never been less than twice the highest recorded before the gun control laws took effect in1920. In fact, over the last twelve years, the British armed robbery rate has increased anastonishing 300% while the American rate has dropped (Ten Myths 5). Also, from 1930 to 1975,the British murder rate has increased 50% while the American murder rate rose 30%. Anotherforeign nation, Jamaica, totally prohibited gun ownership in 1974. By 1980, Jamaicas gunmurder rate was six times that of Washington D.C., which has the highest rate of any Americancity. However, Switzerland, Israel, Denmark and Finland, all of whom have a higher gunownership rate than America, all have lower crime rates than America, in fact, their crime ratesare among the lowest in the Western World (Bender 148). Granting gun owners more freedom to carry their weapons responsibly has not causedAmericas crime rate to increase! Rather, American crime has been shown to decrease whenmore freedom is allowed. In 1996, the University of Chicago Law School conducted a study ofthe crime rates of every county in America over the last fifteen years and determined that violentcrime fell after states made it legal to carry concealed weapons, with murder rates dropping8.5%, rapes by 5%, aggravated assaults by 7%, and robberies by 3%. Overall, it is estimated that1.5 to 2.5 million people use guns for defense in America every year, saving society up to 38.9billion dollars annually (Pratt 16A). Another fabrication of gun control advocates is that gun control would reduce crimes ofpassion, in which a person kills a family member in a fit of rage. However, 90% of allhomicides involving family members killed by other family members are preceded by violencethat caused such a disturbance that police were summoned. Professor James Wright of theUniversity of Massachusetts conducted a study of crimes of passion and determined that themurders were, the culminating event in a long history of interpersonal violence between theparties. He elaborated, noting that, The common pattern, the more common pattern, is forwives to shoot their husbands. Proportionately, men kill their women by other means, morebrutal means, more degrading means. To deny that woman the right to own the firearm is, in asense, to guarantee in perpetuity to her husband the right to beat her at will (Ten Myths 6). Professor Wright, with Professor Peter Rossi, conducted another landmark study of 1800criminals that disproves another myth, namely that handguns are not an effective means ofdeterrence and protection. In the study, 85% of criminals felt a smart criminal would try todetermine if his potential victim was armed. 75% of burglars avoided homes that were occupiedfor fear of being shot. 80% of handgun predators encountered armed citizens, and 57% ofthem were scared off by shots from armed citizens. In fact 60% of criminals fear armed citizensmore than police (Ten Myths 4). It is with good reason that criminals fear armed citizens. In a typical year, armed citizenskill between 1,500 to 2,800 felons in excusable self-defense and justifiably wound 8,000 to16,000. Police kill 300 to 600 criminals per year justifiably.(Ten Myths 4) Despite the large gapbetween police and citizen killings of criminals, citizens have better judgment, mistakenly killingonly 30 innocent people per year, compared to 330 people police kill in the United States peryear. Also, criminals succeed in disarming citizens in less than 1% of encounters (NCPACRIME 1). For these reasons, handguns are effective deterrents to crime. In addition, defense doesnot require anyone to be hurt. In fact, 98% of protection cases involves the citizen eitherbrandishing his gun or firing warning shots into the air. Even among criminals, protection fromother criminals is the number one reason for possessing a gun (NCPA CRIME 1). Radiology best flashThe reason gun control fails should be obvious to an intelligent person. Since a criminaldoes not, by definition, obey laws, gun control cannot hope to be applied to them as they willaccess their guns by criminal means. These same laws will leave a law abiding citizen almosttotally defenseless as the law provides them no means of protection. Meanwhile, criminals, whoare often not oblivious to the news, will be emboldened by the knowledge that their potentialvictims have no means of defense. Plainly, gun violence is a problem in America, but if gun control does not work, whatwill? The answer is laws adding extra punishments for criminal use of guns. This targets thecriminal element of society while protecting those citizens who own guns for lawful purposes. Furthermore, these laws work. Virginias murder and robbery rates dropped 31 and 23% respectively in fourteen yearsafter the passage of mandatory penalties for firearms offenders. Arkansass homicide ratedropped 25% in fifteen years and Delawares homicide rate dropped 42% in thirteen years aftermandatory penalties were legislated Delaware also recorded a 52% drop in robberies over thesame period (Ten Myths 11). These figures show that mandatory sentences help to reduce armed violence by sending aclear message to criminals: criminal misuse of a firearm will not be tolerated and will be swiftlyand severely punished. Coupled with the deterrence value of armed citizens, these laws reducecrime by introducing to the criminal the possibility of longer jail terms, wounds, or even death. Another solution to the problem of handgun violence is to make gun locks, vaults, andother safety devices a tax-deductible purchase. This would give gun owners an incentive to storetheir guns in safer conditions while reducing the rate of people who are killed either by accidentsor stolen guns. Any funds lost by the government through such a program would almostcertainly be recouped in savings from the prevention of accidental deaths. Gun owners wouldalmost certainly respond positively to such action, given that when Florida offered free gun locksto citizens, they ran out within days and were left scrambling for more (Rogers). Especially after the tragedy of Littleton, it is important to remember that gun control mustbe viewed in a rational and thoughtful manner in which logic and the facts are not overwhelmedby emotion. As the research and presentation of the author demonstrate, the facts speak forthemselves. Gun control is a misdirected attempt to curtail criminals by stripping the law abidingof the ability to arm themselves for protection. Gun control often has no measurable effect oncrime, and when the effect can be measured, it often reveals an increase in the crime rate. Furthermore, gun control would reduce funds for the apprehension of criminals, reduce theeffectiveness of police forces, waste millions, perhaps billions of dollars, and serve as a possiblemeans for tyranny to stamp out any possible resistance. Therefore, gun control should be viewed not as a solution, but as a catalyst for furtherincreases in violence and lawlessness in America. Any law that aims to punish the criminal atthe expense of the law abiding is doomed to failure. Current efforts to punish gun makers for themisuse of guns is comparable to suing auto makers for the deaths caused by drunk drivers. Careful review of the facts reveals that what is needed in America is not gun control, butcommon sense coupled with a better concept: criminal control. OutlineThesis: Despite the claims of gun control activists, gun control does not reduce crime. I. IntroductionII. Myths of Gun ControlA. Foreign gun control worksB. Gun control reduces crimes of passionC. Criminals do not fear armed citizensD. Guns contribute to crimeE. Criminals are constitutionally exempt from gun controlF. American favor gun controlG. Police support gun controlH. Registry is a harmless aspect of gun controlI.Gun control reduces crimeIII. ConclusionA. SolutionsB. Final analysis and personal observations LIST OF WORKS CITEDBender, David ed. Would Gun Control Reduce Crime? St. Paul: Greenhaven Press, 1984. Matza, Michael. Do more guns mean less crime? No point blank answers Philadelphia Enquirer 31 May, 1998. NCPA Crime Summary. Available (Online) http://www.arcrafts.com/think/Essays/NCPACrime.html. 4 April 1999. Pratt, Larry. Concealed guns save lives. USA Today. 26 April, 1999. natl. ed. Rogers, Bill. Gun Locks Go Faster Than Police Can Hand Them Out. Naples Daily News. 27March, 1998, natl. ed. Ten Myths About Gun Control. Available (Online)http://www.arcrafts.com/think/Essays/Ten.html. 4 April 1999.